Who's mistake is it anyway?

Claim: Comprehensive Plan is not self-executing. ECDC needs implementation language for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.

Truth: Effect of Plan section of the Comprehensive Plan clearly states the requirement for the Hearing Examiner advisory opinion of compliance prior to Council decision in 1.) Street Vacations and Dedications and 2.) Public Projects.

Furthermore, ECDC 20.70.080 Staff Report preparation (A) (3) states the staff shall conduct, “An analysis of the requested vacation in relation to the provisions of this chapter and the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan…”

Which document is it, The Comprehensive Plan or Edmonds Community Development Code that the staff fails to comprehend. The City Attorney advises the City Council the ECDC requires new language and legal services to straighten out the wordsmith quagmire of his own execution.

For many Years, Ogden Murphy Wallace Law Firm has represented the city. The City Attorney should know the code forwards and backwards because most of writing and changes are his work product. Nevertheless, The City Attorney presents a legal memo claiming need for his expertise and legal advice for immediate council action to fix his own errors. The City Council should request a refund or better yet make a claim on his professional liability insurance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

EMAIL TO COUNCIL PRESIDENT

Lighthouse Law Group's inferior legal representation

The Edmonds City Council Again Violates the Open Public Meetings Act.