Hiding under the covers!


PLEASE READ THESE EMAILS IN REVERSE ORDER.
Mr. Tupper,
Your inquiries are being forwarded to Grant Weed for response.
Sincerely,
Mike Thies

-----Original Message-----From: Finis Tupper [mailto:finistupper@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 8:10 AMTo: Thies, MikeCc: Haakenson, Gary; 'Stephen A. Bernheim'; daveandmarthaorvis@gmail.com; Wilson, DJSubject: RE: Email Followup

Dear Mr. Thies:

Please be more specific. Are you denying me the opportunity to meet with you to discuss your actions prior to the matter being referred to Weed, Graafstra and Benson?

It is very clear to me you choose to ignore my email of January 8th requesting an appointment. What City Policy or Official Direction did you rely on to determine no need for response? Or do you make it a habit to ignore citizen requests?

Thank you,
Finis
From: Thies, Mike [mailto:thies@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 7:43 AMTo: Finis TupperCc: Haakenson, Gary; Stephen A. Bernheim; daveandmarthaorvis@gmail.com; Wilson, DJSubject: RE: Email Followup

Mr. Tupper,
As previously noted, your inquiry has been forwarded to conflict council, Weed, Graafstra and Benson. Mr. Weed will be responding to any and all questions regarding your inquiry, including any questions regarding the status of the inquiry once it was faxed to City Hall.
Sincerely,
Mike Thies


-----Original Message-----From: Finis Tupper [mailto:finistupper@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 7:33 AMTo: Thies, MikeCc: Haakenson, Gary; 'Stephen A. Bernheim'; daveandmarthaorvis@gmail.com; Wilson, DJSubject: Email Followup

Dear Mr. Thies:

On January 8, I emailed you requesting an appointment to discuss my December 9, 2009 Code Enforcement fax. You have not responded.

Do you make it a habit of ignoring a citizen request or just certain citizens? I would appreciate a copy of your Department policy and criteria for determining whether you will respond or ignore a citizen’s request for code enforcement or a meeting to discuss an issue.

Thank you,

Finis Tupper
711 Daley St.
Edmonds WA 98020
(425) 778-9465

WHERE'S THE MONEY - MAYOR?
www.edmonds-wa.blogspot.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

EMAIL TO COUNCIL PRESIDENT

Dear D.J., If you get a chance, I would appreciate your sharing the attached PowerPoint with the Citizens Committee. This information provides evidence, beyond any reasonable doubt, that the City of Edmonds has been providing Fire and Emergency Medical Services for less than the cost of service to the unincorporated Esperance and Fire District No. 1. I'm hoping the group will truly look to Budget before focusing on just the taxpayer's pocketbook. The question I ask you; Is the newly created EMS Transport fee required for the subsidization of the two interlocal agreements with Esperance and Woodway ? The council, mayor and staff have not done proper due diligence of the current and passed city financial decisions to start requesting more and new taxes from the citizens. Fire District No. 1 collects tax revenue 1 million City of Edmonds charges 300,000 for service. City of Edmonds makes annual payment for Station No. 10 to Fire District No. 1 65,000. City of Ed
Read more

Lighthouse Law Group's inferior legal representation

 Email to Jeff Taraday  PROVIDED FOR THE RECORD:   In Washington State there can be only one open public hearing.   The Hearing Examiner had 10 working days to make a decision. Any extension of that time requirement requires agreement from the applicant and the parties. Uniquely, the Edmonds City Code requires agreement from all parties. I testified at the hearing and was not asked to participate in this extension or provide any further testimony. In fact, my participation has been excluded because of the one open meeting. If there have been communications between the Hearing Examiner and the Applicant those communication would  be ex parte and needed to be provided to me.    Mr. Clugston testified that traditionally the Planning Staff posts the Agenda and Staff report at the Civic Center and Library. Then he stated that ECC 1.03.09 didn’t apply that was for City Council hearings. He stated the Agenda was posted on the City’s website 7 or 6 days prior to hearing. The City C
Read more

The Edmonds City Council Again Violates the Open Public Meetings Act.

Edmonds City Council First Executive Session of May 26th 2020 The City Council may meet in executive (closed) session but only for one of the reasons specified in and in accordance with procedures identified in RCW 42.30.110. A personnel matter including a separation agreement is not specifically identified in RCW 42.30.110(1) and therefore is not a legally sufficient reason to meet in closed executive session. The Council discussed the Finance Director Scott James, Separation Agreement in the closed executive session under the guise of potential litigation. When in fact, any potential litigation ceased to exist on May 25 th , 2020, and the seven days from the date Mr. James signed the Separation Agreement, May 18 th , 2020, thus waiving all of his rights to pursue any civil action against the City of Edmonds. On May 26 th , 2020 during agenda item (4) Council President Adrienne Fraley-Monillas moved to add an Executive Session regarding “potential litigation” per RCW 42.30.1
Read more