Skipper's Property

APRIL 20TH - 7:00PM
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Agenda Item: 9
Public Comment on possible purchase of Skipper's Property 102 Main St.

Agenda Item: 10
Public Comment on Budget Cuts.

Comments

Larry Wilson said…
The Skipper's property is a very special place in Edmonds and would make a wonderful bakey. Imagine having fresh Cinnamon rolls while waiting to board the fery. There would have to be a selction to make the bakery concept work; with raisins, without raisins, with cream cheese frosting and of course without.
Throw in some fresh brewed coffee and the city of Edmonds could have a whole new way of earning money!
Larry, (with raisins please!).
April 18, 2010 at 9:02 AM
Finis Tupper said…
That does sound a whole lot better than what was being proposed a "Jack in Box" fast food restaurant.

Buy the property Larry your business concept makes sense. Besides you're not asking for 75ft Building Height. Edmonds needs more lattes to keep our Mayor and City Staff from sleeping on the job! Besides this address would keep them out of City Hall for a greater duration of time. You know less work time means less screw-ups.

Larry, you could be the Savior of our "small-town" character and charm!
April 18, 2010 at 11:16 AM
Anonymous said…
Sorry Tupper, there is nothing better than a Jumbo Jack at 1 am as the bars are geting ready to close! I think a Jack N Box across from the bar is a GRAND idea!
May 14, 2010 at 11:03 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lighthouse Law Group's inferior legal representation

 Email to Jeff Taraday  PROVIDED FOR THE RECORD:   In Washington State there can be only one open public hearing.   The Hearing Examiner had 10 working days to make a decision. Any extension of that time requirement requires agreement from the applicant and the parties. Uniquely, the Edmonds City Code requires agreement from all parties. I testified at the hearing and was not asked to participate in this extension or provide any further testimony. In fact, my participation has been excluded because of the one open meeting. If there have been communications between the Hearing Examiner and the Applicant those communication would  be ex parte and needed to be provided to me.    Mr. Clugston testified that traditionally the Planning Staff posts the Agenda and Staff report at the Civic Center and Library. Then he stated that ECC 1.03.09 didn’t apply that was for City Council hearings. He stated the Agenda was posted on the City’s website 7 or 6...
Read more

The Edmonds City Council Again Violates the Open Public Meetings Act.

Edmonds City Council First Executive Session of May 26th 2020 The City Council may meet in executive (closed) session but only for one of the reasons specified in and in accordance with procedures identified in RCW 42.30.110. A personnel matter including a separation agreement is not specifically identified in RCW 42.30.110(1) and therefore is not a legally sufficient reason to meet in closed executive session. The Council discussed the Finance Director Scott James, Separation Agreement in the closed executive session under the guise of potential litigation. When in fact, any potential litigation ceased to exist on May 25 th , 2020, and the seven days from the date Mr. James signed the Separation Agreement, May 18 th , 2020, thus waiving all of his rights to pursue any civil action against the City of Edmonds. On May 26 th , 2020 during agenda item (4) Council President Adrienne Fraley-Monillas moved to add an Executive Session regarding “potential litigation” per RCW 42.30.1...
Read more