Nelson off on wrong foot - who is trying to recreate history?

During the March 3, 2020 City Council Meeting, the following took place:

Mayor Mike Nelson stated that the “next item on the agenda is approval of the agenda”.  Mayor Nelson then stated:

“And before Council approves, I just want to let you know that both Council President and I have pulled item 8.1, which is the Resolution adopting Council Rules and Procedure and updating the Council Code of Conduct because it still needs some updating and review.”

After a pause, Mayor Nelson asked: “Is there a motion to approve the agenda?”

Council President Adrienne Fraley-Monillas said: “So moved” and Councilmember Luke Distelhorst said “second”.  The Motion carried unanimously. 

Nobody made a Motion TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED.  The agenda had NOT been amended by vote of the Council.  Instead, Mayor Nelson and Council President Adrienne Fraley-Monillas had pulled an item from the agenda on their own.

The next morning, March 4, 2020, 9:21 am, citizen Ken Reidy emailed City Council, cc City Attorney Jeff Taraday, an email that included:

Last night, an item was removed form(sp) the agenda without a vote – the Mayor stating that he and the Council President had pulled item 8.1 from the agenda.  What authority does Mayor Nelson have to pull an item from the agenda?  Why didn’t the City attorney advise that a City Council vote was needed to pull an item from the agenda? 

A little over 2 hours later, 11:45 am, Reidy emailed City Council, cc City Attorney Jeff Taraday, the following:

The City Council voted to adopt Roberts Rules of Order, as modified.  I think the related Resolution was No. 1295.
I believe the proper procedure is: 
  1. A motion to approve the agenda is made and seconded and then;
  2. Once the adoption of the agenda is the pending item of business, a councilmember can move to amend the agenda, exactly as any other motion could be amended.  For example, a motion can be made to remove an agenda item.  If the motion is seconded, a vote takes place.
  3. After the vote on the amendment takes place, the agenda itself can then be approved (unless there are further amendments). 

    Please confirm the above.  If I am wrong, please provide clear procedures so all know how this is supposed to work.  Thanks.Ken Reidy

Two days later, March 6, 2020 7:04 am, citizen Ken Reidy emailed City Council, cc City Attorney Jeff Taraday, the following:

Please know that March 3, 2020 City Council Agenda packet page 169 represents that Robert's Rules were adopted via Resolution No 1295:
City Council Agenda Item 
Meeting Date: 03/3/2020 
Resolution adopting Council Rules of Procedure and updating the Council Code of Conduct 
Staff Lead: Council/Laura Johnson 
Department: City Council 
Preparer: Maureen Judge 
Background/History In 2013, the City Council passed Resolution No. 1295, which adopted Robert's Rules of Order as its parliamentary authority for the conduct of City Council meetings. In December 2013, the Council passed Resolution No. 1306 adopting a new Code of Conduct and in June 2015, the Council approved a new Code of Ethics. 

I hope this information is helpful.
Ken Reidy

Reidy received no email responses to any of his three emails.

Fast forward to the City Council Agenda Packet for the March 24, 2020 City Council Meeting, an Agenda that includes approval of the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes for March 3, 2020.
The minutes represent that Council President Fraley-Monillas MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED.  That is not true.  See above. She never made such a motion.  Also, the minutes fail to disclose that it was Mayor Nelson and Council President Fraley-Monillas that removed the item from the agenda.  Furthermore, as previously discussed, there never was a motion to AMEND the agenda and Council never voted to AMEND.  
How does this happen?  Where did the words TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDEDcome from and how did they end up in the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes for March 3, 2020?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Edmonds City Council Again Violates the Open Public Meetings Act.

Edmonds City Council First Executive Session of May 26th 2020 The City Council may meet in executive (closed) session but only for one of the reasons specified in and in accordance with procedures identified in RCW 42.30.110. A personnel matter including a separation agreement is not specifically identified in RCW 42.30.110(1) and therefore is not a legally sufficient reason to meet in closed executive session. The Council discussed the Finance Director Scott James, Separation Agreement in the closed executive session under the guise of potential litigation. When in fact, any potential litigation ceased to exist on May 25 th , 2020, and the seven days from the date Mr. James signed the Separation Agreement, May 18 th , 2020, thus waiving all of his rights to pursue any civil action against the City of Edmonds. On May 26 th , 2020 during agenda item (4) Council President Adrienne Fraley-Monillas moved to add an Executive Session regarding “potential litigation” per RCW 42.30.1
Read more

Lighthouse Law Group's inferior legal representation

 Email to Jeff Taraday  PROVIDED FOR THE RECORD:   In Washington State there can be only one open public hearing.   The Hearing Examiner had 10 working days to make a decision. Any extension of that time requirement requires agreement from the applicant and the parties. Uniquely, the Edmonds City Code requires agreement from all parties. I testified at the hearing and was not asked to participate in this extension or provide any further testimony. In fact, my participation has been excluded because of the one open meeting. If there have been communications between the Hearing Examiner and the Applicant those communication would  be ex parte and needed to be provided to me.    Mr. Clugston testified that traditionally the Planning Staff posts the Agenda and Staff report at the Civic Center and Library. Then he stated that ECC 1.03.09 didn’t apply that was for City Council hearings. He stated the Agenda was posted on the City’s website 7 or 6 days prior to hearing. The City C
Read more

Skipper's Property

APRIL 20TH - 7:00PM Edmonds City Council Meeting Agenda Item: 9 Public Comment on possible purchase of Skipper's Property 102 Main St. Agenda Item: 10 Public Comment on Budget Cuts.
Read more