Who's mistake is it anyway?

Claim: Comprehensive Plan is not self-executing. ECDC needs implementation language for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.

Truth: Effect of Plan section of the Comprehensive Plan clearly states the requirement for the Hearing Examiner advisory opinion of compliance prior to Council decision in 1.) Street Vacations and Dedications and 2.) Public Projects.

Furthermore, ECDC 20.70.080 Staff Report preparation (A) (3) states the staff shall conduct, “An analysis of the requested vacation in relation to the provisions of this chapter and the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan…”

Which document is it, The Comprehensive Plan or Edmonds Community Development Code that the staff fails to comprehend. The City Attorney advises the City Council the ECDC requires new language and legal services to straighten out the wordsmith quagmire of his own execution.

For many Years, Ogden Murphy Wallace Law Firm has represented the city. The City Attorney should know the code forwards and backwards because most of writing and changes are his work product. Nevertheless, The City Attorney presents a legal memo claiming need for his expertise and legal advice for immediate council action to fix his own errors. The City Council should request a refund or better yet make a claim on his professional liability insurance.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Edmonds City Council Again Violates the Open Public Meetings Act.

Edmonds City Council First Executive Session of May 26th 2020 The City Council may meet in executive (closed) session but only for one of the reasons specified in and in accordance with procedures identified in RCW 42.30.110. A personnel matter including a separation agreement is not specifically identified in RCW 42.30.110(1) and therefore is not a legally sufficient reason to meet in closed executive session. The Council discussed the Finance Director Scott James, Separation Agreement in the closed executive session under the guise of potential litigation. When in fact, any potential litigation ceased to exist on May 25 th , 2020, and the seven days from the date Mr. James signed the Separation Agreement, May 18 th , 2020, thus waiving all of his rights to pursue any civil action against the City of Edmonds. On May 26 th , 2020 during agenda item (4) Council President Adrienne Fraley-Monillas moved to add an Executive Session regarding “potential litigation” per RCW 42.30.1
Read more

Lighthouse Law Group's inferior legal representation

 Email to Jeff Taraday  PROVIDED FOR THE RECORD:   In Washington State there can be only one open public hearing.   The Hearing Examiner had 10 working days to make a decision. Any extension of that time requirement requires agreement from the applicant and the parties. Uniquely, the Edmonds City Code requires agreement from all parties. I testified at the hearing and was not asked to participate in this extension or provide any further testimony. In fact, my participation has been excluded because of the one open meeting. If there have been communications between the Hearing Examiner and the Applicant those communication would  be ex parte and needed to be provided to me.    Mr. Clugston testified that traditionally the Planning Staff posts the Agenda and Staff report at the Civic Center and Library. Then he stated that ECC 1.03.09 didn’t apply that was for City Council hearings. He stated the Agenda was posted on the City’s website 7 or 6 days prior to hearing. The City C
Read more

Skipper's Property

APRIL 20TH - 7:00PM Edmonds City Council Meeting Agenda Item: 9 Public Comment on possible purchase of Skipper's Property 102 Main St. Agenda Item: 10 Public Comment on Budget Cuts.
Read more